The diagram illustrates how West Park secondary school has transformed over a period of 60 years since it was formed in 1950. It can be seen that the school had undergone some significant changes during this time period, including the extension of school structure, as well as the addition of a sports field and a parking lot.
In 1950, the school only had one building, which was right next to the residential area. There was only a playground just behind the school and farmland located south-west of it. The dwellings were removed after 30 years to make way for a car park. Furthermore, the structure was divided into two parts, one of which was designated as the science block and the other as the main structure. Another notable development was the transformation of farmland into a sports field.
Looking at the school in 2010, the only marked alteration was the expansion of the parking lot, which now occupies over half of the total space. As a result, the size of the sports field and playground had to be reduced in order for the car park to be exlarged.
- The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950
- Newspapers are less important nowadays because we have up to date access to the news on the internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...tal space. As a result, the size of the sports field and playground had to be reduced ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, second, so, well, as for, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70744680851 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64426979397 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4373789268 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212400476956 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892879277167 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859298284105 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151310850511 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812170881052 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.