The maps show the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the maps delineating modifications of the village of Pebbleton during the two-decade-phase.
Overall, the village experienced drastic alterations, with the most noticeable being a massive addition of the buildings, along with several novel facilities.
Perceptibly, 20 years ago, in the west-north of the area, there was a lighthouse and an old fort built, which was then converted into a playground for kids. However, in the opposite direction was placed a film studio, at which new flats were represented 20 years later. Strikingly, the number of houses constructed at the end of Lighthouse Lane has been twofold in the past 20 years.
When it comes to the later 20 years, there was an emergence of a footpath, which aims to provide access to the school, deriving from the other side of the river to a new added tennis course along Lighthouse Lane. Furthermore, the village witnessed the appearance of a community centre placed between children’s playing spot and halls of residence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- The maps give information about a university sports court 67
- The map shows how coastal land develops into a coastal park 78
- As we are facing more and more problems which affect the whole planet good relationships between different countries are becoming more important than ever before To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The use of corporal punishment physically hitting students in schools is in decline yet it should be used to improve behaviour To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18518518519 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09620670514 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641975308642 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6290411242 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123006665316 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560638536051 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035046851374 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725150529848 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405800966936 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.