The diagram shows the development of a particular area between 1995 to the present day

Essay topics:

The diagram shows the development of a particular area between 1995 to the present day.

The picture given illustrates the modernization of a specific region from 1995 to now.
It is evident from the diagram that the area has undergone noticeable transformations, with the most typical one is the erections of a road bridge and a foot bridge to connect two sides of a river. Additionally, more amenities have been erected to meet the demands of local residents.
To the northeast of the road bridge, in 1995, there were houses called Ashford, whose locations have remained unchanged, whereas an apartment has been constructed adjacent to them currently. Meanwhile, more houses and a car park have substituted the available land in the south of houses. At the same time, trees situated opposite the houses have been chopped down to make way for the introduction of a car park, accompanied by the constructions of the road bridge at the position where a ferry used to be in 1995.
To the southeast of the road bridge , there used to be available land in 1995, which have been converted into houses. In addition, the foot bridge has been built at the location which is flanked by houses to the north and a car park and Yatch marina to the south. By contrast, the plots of land situated in the south-west corner has not experienced any changes.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-25 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-12-01 Delime 78 view
2023-10-12 Molla Md Rezaul Karim 73 view
2023-09-18 maiphuonganh 84 view
2023-09-18 maiphuonganh 11 view
Essays by user vuhungbo :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...95. To the southeast of the road bridge , there used to be available land in 1995...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78801843318 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82277119198 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539170506912 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5673978804 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.444444444 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0661869933695 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0283401673113 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281334175273 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0460774419121 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155552373194 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.