The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 comparing to 2008.
As can be seen from the map, the medical centre experienced a dramatic transformation with the addition of an education room, a mother and child room, a pharmacy and a store room.
In 2008, there existed a small medical centre with a limited number of rooms. The main entrance leading to waiting room which remained unchanged in size and position. Likewise, the staff office, the reception and the laboratory experienced no changes over the period. The corridor was the way to three doctor’s offices located to the east of the treatment room and the staff office in the middle of the centre.
In 2010, the medical centre was expanded with the installation of an education room and a mother and chid room in the area to the south of the treatment room. A new pharmacy was constructed in the southeast corner of the medical facility next to the laboratory. Doctor’s offices are downsized to make room for one more doctor’s office and a new store room was also created in the northeast corner of the centre.
- The charts show information about children learning musical instruments in 1996 and 2016 in the UK 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table data below shows the top ten Internet users by country in 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 15 11
- Most university graduates earn more money than less well educated people Some people argue that this means they should pay the full cost of their education To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
- process of Pe uh raw tea and ripe tea 56
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: unchanged
... leading to waiting room which remained unchanged in size and position. Likewise, the staff offic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, likewise, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83854166667 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73583294465 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505208333333 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0130693835 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113555978804 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595708371014 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686781953229 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917316694608 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063118515617 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: unchanged
... leading to waiting room which remained unchanged in size and position. Likewise, the staff offic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, likewise, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83854166667 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73583294465 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505208333333 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0130693835 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113555978804 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595708371014 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686781953229 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917316694608 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063118515617 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.