The diagram shows the plan of medical center in 2008 and 2010.
The given diagram illustrates the project of a medical center in 2008 and in 2010.
Overall, it is manifest from the diagram that, there were lots of changes were made in just two years.
According to the diagram, in 2008, the main entrance was opened to the waiting room that led towards to the north side. In the waiting room, staff office and reception were there. To the right side of the waiting room, laboratory was opened which also had access from the waiting room. On the northwest side, treatment room was opened. From the right side of the treatment room, there were three doctor's office which also opened the door to the corridor.
In 2010, looking towards to the southwest ward an education room and mother and child room were constructed. Pharmacy was designed on the southeast side behind the laboratory which also opened the door to corridor. Interestingly, doctor's office turned into small and converted to four instead of three office. Store room was added to the northeast side just after doctor's room.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-11 | jimit patel | 58 | view |
| 2022-07-24 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-24 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-24 | Giang Tran | 48 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause severe social problems as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The prevention of health problems is more important than treatment. Government funding should reflect that.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The diagram shows the plan of medical center in 2008 and 2010 76
- The Table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 Scottish adults (aged 16 years and over) whether they had taken part in different cultural activities in the past 12 months.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89142857143 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3317786852 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508571428571 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.8921293631 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.8181818182 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9090909091 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.63636363636 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114145518067 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066269229307 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14363896325 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154605713331 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.202880984285 0.0819641961636 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.