The table below shows the questionnaire about the opinion of club members and the general public about the new theatre in one town in 2012.
The table illustrates the rate of appreciation of club members and the general public about the new theatre in one town in 2012.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the large number of opinions rated as excellent in all three norms of the new theatre which is the reason why the percentage of people who rated poor was very small.
Looking at the graph for more detail, 88% was the proportion of excellent which was rated by club members about quality and became the highest percentage in three of categories. Besides that facilities and information also had a remarkable amount of people who rated excellent, with 72% and 54% respectively. Because club members appreciated excellent very highly so the percentage of members rated poor lower, just 2%, and the highest in information with 16%.
On the other hand, the general public ranked information as excellent, with 66% while facilities were slightly lower than that, at 64%. Although the information was rated highly, the number of people who had a bad experience with this category was the highest figure, with 14% while the quality was evaluated as excellent lowest and also the lowest poor experience, at 7%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...of appreciation of club members and the general public about the new theatre in one town in 20...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people who rated poor was very small. Looking at the graph for more detail, 8...
^^^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ion with 16%. On the other hand, the general public ranked information as excellent, with 6...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, look, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99497487437 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62721334177 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51256281407 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.9049892027 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206332197462 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135998559493 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.202640473191 0.0843802449381 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207661964216 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.241455781949 0.0819641961636 295% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.