The given diagrams illustrate the current layout of an exhibition of art and its proposed changes in the future.
Overall, the gallery will witness a notable refurbishment, with a new entrance and an increase in exhibition space.
On the right-hand side of the existing layout, there is the entrance which leads to a lobby. Nonetheless, in the future, the main display area will be directly accessible by the new entrance located to the Parkinson court side of the gallery. The current office and lobby will be converted into a storage room and an education area including two tables and ten desks.
Another significant change is that two temporary exhibitions at present will be removed. This removal will make room for the bigger permanent exhibition area which is proposed to be twice as large as the current one. In addition, the art gallery will be widened towards the west by constructing a special exhibition area and an exhibition store where visitors can purchase some available souvenirs.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement High school students should wear uniforms to schools 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 56
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 73
- Some people believe that school children should be made to wear a uniform Others feel that children should be free to choose their own clothes do you agree or disagree with pupils wearing uniforms 78
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nonetheless, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10909090909 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8217572627 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587878787879 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3416654415 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.375 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154768509904 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072612692481 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064386372223 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112768434681 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616423329017 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.