The given maps illustrate how Castellon, a city of Spain, has developed in recent years/ from 2000 to now.
Overall, the town has witnessed a significant urbanisation, notably with an increase in entertaining services and commercial facilities and the transformation of the transport network.
In detail, there is now a hall of residence to the left of the university which has remained its location in the northern part of the maps. The old market to the left of the city center has been demolished and replaced with a new shop. To the right of the heart of the town, a new shopping center and covered market have been built, as a result, the trees have been cut down to make way for them. It is noticeable that a new cinema and a range of bars and clubs have been constructed in the port area which is situated in the south of the map.
In addition, one of the striking changes in the transportation system of Castellon is an introduction of an airport which is under construction and the conversion of the old train station into a police station. At present, there is a brand new train station to the north of the city center, adjacent to a tramline connecting the university and the town center. Furthermore, the central area of Castellon is now utilized as a bike rental scheme, and the road along this area has been pedestrianized.
- The diagram shows the process for labelling shellfish for the international market Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 61
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006 89
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 56
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66806722689 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88480492027 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521008403361 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4331837817 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.444444444 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0916223601959 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395044562195 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427489354055 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633640104765 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055980093868 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66806722689 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88480492027 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521008403361 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4331837817 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.444444444 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0916223601959 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395044562195 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427489354055 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633640104765 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055980093868 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.