the diagrams below give info on transport and car use in Edmonton.
The pie chart indicates the proportions of means of transport, while the table shows the reasons why people living in the city use their cars in Edmonton.
Overall, cars are the most popular means of transport used by residents of Edmonton. In addition, the percentage of people who use cars for commuting to work is higher than that for other reasons.
Looking at the pie chart, 45% residents travel by cars. This is followed by LRT at 35%, while the figures for buses and taxis are the exact same, represent only 10%.
The table compares five reasons for using cars in Edmonton. The reasons which relate to work are shown for the highest figures, with a figure of 55% for commuting to work and 45% for business. Likewise, taking children to school is also relatively high on the list, at 40%. Using cars for shopping and leisure activities have smaller proportions, each amount to 15%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing countries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
- Internet users as percentage of population. 78
- the graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the Uk, 2000 - 2010.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 73
- what are the advantages and disadvantages for children of TV? 61
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups, UK 1990. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, likewise, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 736.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74838709677 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42025789598 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7390450224 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7777777778 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206753490053 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107135102078 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112221067952 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14368531231 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962737061129 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.