The chart below gives information about global sales of games software, CDs and DVD or video.
The given visualization elucidates the sales of games software, CDs and DVD or video over the world in the period from 2000 to 2003.
It is clear that the sales of games software and DVD or video witnessed a steady increase over the time frame while that of CDs went down slightly.
It can be seen from the chart that the figure for CDs was the highest point at the begining of the period, standing at $35, and even almost doubled that for DVD. During the following years, it started to decline constantly but still remained ahead of the others at $32.
On the other hand, DVD or video accounted for the second best sales, then rose decidedly over the period from $18 to its highest mark at just over $30, narrowing the gap between this figure and the highest one. The similar proportion can be seen in games software, whose sales experience a stable growth over four years, from approximately $13 to end the period at a high of about $18.
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where re 73
- The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities Derby and Nottingham Between 2000 and 2009 72
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting the reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given visualization elucidates the s...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...world in the period from 2000 to 2003. It is clear that the sales of games soft...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... while that of CDs went down slightly. It can be seen from the chart that the f...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill remained ahead of the others at 2. On the other hand, DVD or video accounte...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, so, still, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 759.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41279069767 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3308298334 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575581395349 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.3975405972 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245459367499 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133427918026 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097469980369 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177769879773 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822783716386 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.89 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.