The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.
The given diagrams show information about transport and the reason of the people for using the car in Edmonton.
Overall, it can be seen that in the pie-chart the big majority of transport is considered a car. The digits are measuring by percentages.
According to the pie-chart, the percentage of transport for a car experienced an increase to 45 %, whilst the number of people who are using by bus and taxi are the least rate just one in ten. In the second place is appeared users of light rail transit (35 %), which is only 10 % less than car users.
Now turning to the details on the table, the reasons for the needs of car transport for commuting to job and business are 55 %-45 % respectively. To take their children to school by car is the third reason, about two fifths. Finally, while the figure for shopping reason is 15 %, at the same number of purpose is for leisure activities.
To sum up, most people in Edmonton use cars for going to work, business and taking children
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for music and sport and others are not However it s sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become good sports person or musician Discuss the two ideas y 61
- the graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the informaiton by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- most people agree that money cannot be happiness why is happiness difficult to understand how can people achieve happiness 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, so, third, while, to sum up, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58522727273 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56361925946 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0111095683 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276568839423 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11951625806 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129271677164 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187473574832 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135336451416 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.