The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.
The pie chart compares the proportion of residents using transportation, categorized by four modes of transport in Edmonton. The table indicates the reasons why people use car in the city.
As can be seen, car is by far the most preferred means of transport in Edmonton. Of the five reasons for car use in the city, most people choose commuting to work as the main reason.
Specifically, with nearly half of the residents showing preference for car (45%), this transport becomes the most widely used in the city. Closely following is the second popular mode, Light Rail Transit, when its figure is less than the dominant merely 10%. In contrast, bus and taxi tend to be the least favored mode, sharing the same user’s percentage of 10%.
When it comes to the reason for car use, it appears that a large proportion of 55% residents utilize this mode for work commuting. They also favor using car for business and taking children to school, whose proportions account for 45% and 40% respectively. Only a minimal 15% of inhabitants prefer to go shopping and do leisure activities by this mode of transport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
- The table shows the changes in modes of travel in a European country between 1995 and 2005 It also shows a projection to the year 2015 58
- Some people think that hosting an international sports events is good for the country while some people think this is bad Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The charts give information about the volunteers by organization in 2008 and 2018 Summarizing the report by describing the main features with comparing data 89
- The diagram below shows changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 93
- The diagram below shows how photographs can be produced using digital photographic equipment 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to commute'.
Suggestion: to commute
...car use in the city, most people choose commuting to work as the main reason. Specifica...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...count for 45% and 40% respectively. Only a minimal 15% of inhabitants prefer to g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83684210526 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70962683083 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8805850013 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.9 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223228009709 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101715910347 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668987956679 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163074106657 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614879779797 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.