The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.
The pie chart illustrates the proportion of four modes of transport in Edmonton. The table shows the reasons why this city’s people use their cars.
Overall, it can be seen that car is the most popular mode of transport in Edmonton. The principal reason for the residents of this city to use cars is to commute to work.
From the percentages shown in the pie chart, it is clear that travelling by car accounts for the largest proportion of 45%. Slightly lower than that is the figure for LRT, of 35%. Bus and taxi each accounts for 10% of the total figure.
The table shows that the residents of Edmonton mostly use cars to get to work, to take children to school and for business. 55% of them use cars to get to work. In terms of using car for business, the figure is 45%. The figure for taking children to school is slightly lower, of 40%. The two least popular reasons are shopping and leisure activities, with each of them accounts for only 15%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-26 | Lethanh54 | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-25 | Lethanh54 | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog 70
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 73
- The bar chart below shows the estimated sales of jeans for two companies next year in Turkey The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in jeans at the end of next year 74
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 67
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50857142857 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36536919498 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508571428571 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6937362607 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.75 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.5833333333 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.166666666667 5.23603664747 3% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204863818768 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899690201497 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759343782851 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14203712374 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741673321883 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.1 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.29 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.