The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001.
The maps illustrate the considerable changes that occurred in Felixstone in the UK over the course of 34 years, from 1967 to 2001.
Overall, it is clear that the area was completely transformed with the addition of wind turbines and apartments; however, the golf course, dunes, and some trees remain unchanged.
The most visible and striking difference is that the farmland has been industrialized to make room for other entertainment facilities such as a swimming pool, a hotel, and tennis courts. One of the shops was converted into apartments while the high street in the middle was still left unchanged.
Between 1967 and 2001, two types of beaches took up space where there once were a marina, a pier, and a fish market. The sea has been taken advantage to make a relaxing site for different purposes, private and public. Since then, the place was further expanded for hotels to develop a car park for visitors and the cafe was relocated to the right side of the hotel. Another major change to the area had been the construction of wind turbines in the southwest, next to the sea.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
- Many people are working longer hours Why is this happening What problems can this cause to people 89
- The charts show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 2014 84
- As parts of education students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its language and culture To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 90
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79255319149 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65401013663 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7324645123 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137602004898 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610253897621 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993905606964 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955818154163 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119108661423 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.