The charts show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008-2014.
The pie chart compares the number of people who volunteered in six different organizations from 2008 to 2014.
Overall, it is clear that environmental and sports organizations as long as the health care department increased over the shown period. In contrast, art, educational and other categories slightly decreased between the two years.
In 2008, volunteers who chose to work for educational organizations made up the largest proportion, just under a quarter, followed by the environmental category, which ranked second out of six, at 21%. Next, the art department too up 18% out of the total while sport and other categories had the same percentage, a 15%. The smallest figure can be seen is the proportion of health care organizations, at 7%.
In 2014, environmental organizations attracted more volunteers, therefore, the percentage rose to just under a third, forming the largest part of the chart. Similarly, sports and health care groups had a small increase to 25% and 8% respectively. People who volunteered in educational organizations dropped to 7% compared to the number of volunteers in 2008. The percentage of the art category has a 6% decrease while the remaining group accounted for a little under a tenth.
- To succeed in a business one needs to know maths To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 73
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 89
- Governments should support care vs finance for retired people While they should save money when they get older Discuss both views and give opinions 84
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same work or the same work conditions for life Discuss the possible causes and suggest ways to prepare for people to work in the future 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, similarly, therefore, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23350253807 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2477076434 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593908629442 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4598266582 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.1 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2949620454 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114230824303 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129816254432 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203452378309 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141065242611 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.