The diagrams below show changes in Happy Valley Shopping Centre in 1982 and 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps depict various modifications of a shopping centre called Happy Valley in the years 1982 and 2012.
It is clear that the principal change in the development of this region was the adjustment to some departments over 30 years. In 2012, the lake and some trees were removed to make room for a furniture retail and a parking lot.
Between 1982 and 2012, while the elevator, the entertainment area and toilets were still fixed, a new entrance to the shopping centre replaced the lobby area and the old entrance. This period also witnessed the rearrangement of food, electronics and sports stores. Moreover, the coffee shop no longer existed and themed restaurants were built.
Beside the aforementioned changes, there were two other evolutions in the shopping centre's infrastructure over the period shown. To be specific, the building's space was expanded extensively due to the construction of a furniture retail, which superseded the lake in 1982. Meanwhile, the removal of some trees and the old entrance to the centre led to the emergence of a parking lot.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-20 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-20 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | myduyen282 | 73 | view |
- The diagrams below show changes in Happy Valley Shopping Centre in 1982 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below give information about world forest in five different regions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
- The diagram below shows the production of ceramic pots Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts below give information about world forest in five different regions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07386363636 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89087313264 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585227272727 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2933228814 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173767959948 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689345388975 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683768465554 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12052874909 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722587822078 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.