The diagrams below show the coastal village of seaville in 1980 and 2010.
The table illustrates the engagement of men and women over the age of 15 in chosen sports and physical recreation activities in Australia from 2011 to 2012. In general, australian females were more involved in sports and recreational activities than males, but the total gap was insignificant. Additionally, walking accounted for the highest percentage of male and female participation.
With respect to men, walking for exercise was the most common option, reaching 16.5% and nearly half as much as women. there were several popular types of sports on which males spend their time such as fitness/gym, cycling/BMXing and jogging/running with the proportion of namely 15.1%, 9.8% and 8.7%. The sports and activities exclusively intended for australian men were golf, outdoor football and basketball, making up 8.2%, 4,1% and 2.8% respectively.
Regarding female involvement, the figure for walking was by far the highest among other chosen sports and activities, hitting a peak of 30.4%. there was a slightly greater proportion of women than men taking part in fitness/gym (19.1% compared to 15.1%) and swimming/diving (8.0% compared to 7.5%). australian females also participated in some certain physical activities such as netball and yoga, with the percentage of 4.5% and 3.3%, whereas the two activities recorded no engagement of males.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...16.5% and nearly half as much as women. there were several popular types of sports on...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sports and activities, hitting a peak of 30.4%. there was a slightly greater prop...
^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...d activities, hitting a peak of 30.4%. there was a slightly greater proportion of wo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Australian
... swimming/diving 8.0% compared to 7.5%. australian females also participated in some certa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll and yoga, with the percentage of 4.5% and 3.3%, whereas the two activities rec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, whereas, in general, such as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51690821256 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11240108882 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5488714246 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.888888889 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.