The diagram illustrates, the genetic progression of horse from 40 million years to the modern type of horse. Picture explain the prominent change of horse foot over many million years through.
Initially, the ancestor horse named as Eohippus which is the prime category of modern horse around 40 million years ago. Eohippus foot just look like the human palm or leg with four distinct fingers and most probably a goat shaped appearance. While, after a 10 million year, there was a slight changes in their shape and size of foot such as the aptitude of foot fingers lessen the length and middle two fingers joined together. Moreover, growth of hair on the neck and upper side was predominant and length of tail was increase little which is called as misohippus.
Regarding mcrychippus, found as 15 million years ago which is the primitive view of modern horse such as, his joined finger lengthen more and foot was strengthened to stand on that finger slightly. The size of hair and tail was developed to become a modern horse as seen now. Furthermore, modern horse foot was completely change after 15 million years with strong foot pedal originated from the fingers and with proper ankle joint to flexible. This hard pedal helps to run fast and climb on difficult ways, and long hair on upper part and lengthen tail makes up the modern horse to a beautiful animal.
- Nowadays more and more people want to live by themselves. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative trend? 11
- In today s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge In the future job applicants may not need any formal qualifications To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The pie charts show figures for the use of public libraries in 1990 and 2000 in Britain Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The map below shows the changes in an American town between 1948 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.» Write at least 150 words. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... lengthen more and foot was strengthened to stand on that finger slightly. The s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82978723404 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39875476976 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544680851064 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9847406045 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162748555983 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822504296544 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633962410573 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140116928302 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068407108763 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.