The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding.
The diagrams illustrate the method of protecting houses in areas which are likely to subject to flooding.
Overall, it is clear that there are two types of areas, with and without a stopbank, and at-risk houses are constructed on stilts above the ground.
In the area with a stopbank, the stopbank, a small mound of land built near the river, is considered a flood defense which is higher than the 100-year flood level to prevent the river from busting its bank. Moreover, houses are built on short stilts to prevent water from raining pouring down from the higher another side area. There is also a floodgate attached under the stopbank to let the water from the internal ponding out when it is full.
Houses in without stopbank areas are raised on higher stilts. The stilt height is measured technically to make sure that it is 300 mm higher than the 100-year flood or ponding level. This type of measurement is called freeboard.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-22 | celine ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-07 | HanaVy | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-28 | Chaubui | 61 | view |
| 2022-05-24 | quytnee | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | TranMinhDuc | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information on UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 92
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 72
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 84
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980- 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82098765432 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37993985264 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567901234568 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4689076157 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.625 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156471857651 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841555287645 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11931994953 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135964552201 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141769498022 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.