The diagrams below show the results of a survey from Taiwan explaining how students wanting to study overseas, chose a university from 1998 - 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The tables compare and contrast data on the changes in eight university selection priorities for male and female Taiwanese students considering studying abroad over an 11-year period from 1998 to 2008.
In general, ranking, the cost of tuition, and accommodation remained the main factors in deciding which university to go to for both sexes over this period of time.
More specifically, despite the fact that ranking was the most important factor for both males and females in 1998 with 97% and 100% respectively, both genders focused more on the cost of tuition in 2008 (97% and 95%). By contrast, the least important consideration for males was teaching quality at 6% in 2008, whereas their counterparts felt that teaching methods had even less significance, with only 2% of those questioned selected this. The biggest change in opinion for men was the modern teaching facilities, falling from 66% to 42%, but for the opposite gender, it was language support, with a drop from 39% to 21%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | roadtoapro | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops Write a summary paragraph for the above diagram 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 67
- The charts below show how the consumption of various food groups by people in the UK 1942 2004 5 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Now look at five categories related to the result of a questionnaire regarding how you typically feel about the causes of global warming Then write a 150 word essay 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The tables compare and contrast data on the changes in eight university selec...
^^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver an 11-year period from 1998 to 2008. In general, ranking, the cost of tuition...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rsity to go to for both sexes over this period of time. More specifically, despite the fact...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, in fact, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10975609756 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75790465255 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664634146341 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.5097782611 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 209.5 112.824112599 186% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.0 22.9334400587 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12517288442 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726651000171 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470770612516 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962915489293 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561669843258 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.1 13.2329268293 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.32 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.25 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.06136585366 130% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.