The two diagrams illustrate the layout of a school in 2004 and its expected changes in 2024. It is clear that in the second diagram, there will be one more school building, a new road, relocation of sports field, and some modification to the path and greenland, as well as more students.
Looking at the first diagram, there was a car parking place outside the main entrance, which linked a path connecting the the two school buildings and a sports field. Besides, the rest area in the south and east were covered by lots of trees.
Turning to the new plan, a new school building is planned, adjacent to the original two and the old path will be within this area, which makes it more independent from the rest of school. Furthermore, cars are allowed to go inside the school along a new road, which will be built between the school buildings and the green land, and the road extends to an extra new parking next to the new school building in the northeast of the campus. Meanwhile, sports field, which will make way to the new school buiding, will be moved even south, just off the new road.
As a result of new buildings, the numbers of trees will be reduced and the number of students are expected to rise from 600 in 2004 to 1,000 in 2024.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 61
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ntrance, which linked a path connecting the the two school buildings and a sports field...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ntrance, which linked a path connecting the the two school buildings and a sports field...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, if, look, second, so, well, while, even so, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44104803493 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33034802548 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510917030568 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.7633704301 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.125 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.625 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170410633261 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921890294753 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648047131849 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106207214841 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469705118465 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.