This bar chart presents information of how frequently American people went to fast food restaurants over the years from 2003 to 2013.
As is indicated in the chart, both the percentage of eating in fast food restaurants every day and never remained relatively lower level under 5% and displayed a similar trend that it decreased steadily after reaching highest in 2003.
People who had fast food several times a week and once a week changed in similar pattern during the years, in which more people (well above 30%) went there once per week. The percentage of people who liked fast food once or twice a year experienced a fluctuation by achieving just 30% in 2003, dropping by 5% in 2006 and then soaring to almost 35% in 2013. In addition, less than 15% of Americans had fast food a few times a year during the decade.
Overall, the majority of people in the would like to have meals in fast food restaurants once a week and once or twice a month in the period given.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 73
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57714285714 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44684886901 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577142857143 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.3909400166 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342867392011 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183561511003 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111816088394 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229608928553 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112386285548 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.