The diagrams below show a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007 summarize the information by selecting main features etc

The pictures describes how a small local museum and its surroundings changed after some development in 1957 and 2007
Overall, this area underwent a number of significant changes , the most noticeable of
which are the rearrangement of the museum and the decrease in the number of
trees.
Looking first at the centre of the area , the museum was expanded northwards with a new
education centre and special exhibitions being constructed . The local history room on the northern side of the entrance hall was relocated to the centre, which was accompanied by a new reception. A cafe was constructed , taking up all of the land previously used for the museum store-room. This area also saw a dramatic change, with a new museum shop being built. Another change is that the entrance hall was moved from the centre to the west.
Turning to the surroundings of the museum, in 1957 , the rows of trees were far more , when compared to those in 2007. The wooden area in the bottom right hand corner was
chopped down to make way for a car park catering for easy car storage. Generally , most of the trees in the northern part were cut down and turned into a vacant land.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'describe'.
Suggestion: describe
The pictures describes how a small local museum and its surrou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nderwent a number of significant changes , the most noticeable of which are the r...
^^
Line 4, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...museum and the decrease in the number of trees. Looking first at the centre of ...
^^^
Line 6, column 40, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Looking first at the centre of the area , the museum was expanded northwards with...
^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nd special exhibitions being constructed . The local history room on the northern ...
^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... a new reception. A cafe was constructed , taking up all of the land previously us...
^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ion. A cafe was constructed , taking up all of the land previously used for the museum sto...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 51, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the surroundings of the museum, in 1957 , the rows of trees were far more , when ...
^^
Line 8, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n 1957 , the rows of trees were far more , when compared to those in 2007. The woo...
^^
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...catering for easy car storage. Generally , most of the trees in the northern part ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75369458128 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62812711911 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7121954052 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144545377871 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563539236148 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715585802075 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827718947044 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100257674894 0.0819641961636 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.