The diagrams below show a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007 summarize the information by selecting main features etc.
The diagrams illustrate the changes of a tiny local museum and its layout from 1957 to 2007.
It is clear that the museum was added more rooms for customer services. In addition, trees were destroyed to make room for other constructions.
Looking at two maps, in 1957 , the museum just consisted of three main rooms. In the next 50 years, the local history room was redesigned bigger than the past, while the national history exhibition was divided to make room for an education center. The museum store-room was replaced by the cafe in the corner. A museum shop was built left-beside the museum.
The entrance hall was removed from the middle of the museum to the museumshop's entrance, trees in the garden were cut down in almost all places in the layout, there were few trees in the top left. The road was remained after 50 years and a car park was built in the corner area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-01 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-14 | hoanghihi1234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-01 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- the maps below show a plan of a city in 1950 and at the present
- Is teaching people over 65 to use computers the best way to spend government money To what extent do you agree 61
- The diagrams below show a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007 summarize the information by selecting main features etc 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tructions. Looking at two maps, in 1957 , the museum just consisted of three main...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 724.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61146496815 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36448106565 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0819773222 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4444444444 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139013951352 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740505714903 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884948862478 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114080128624 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111588672374 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.