the diagrams below show two methods of collecting water for irrigation purposes.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

The diagram illustrates two methods for irrigating.

In the first one is a swing basket. In this way, the workforce is human and two men try to bring water up to irrigation channel from a 1-2 meters deep hole by using fore ropes that have been tied around a basket made of bamboo or leather. Whereas, rope and bucket method, shows in the second picture, a cow has been used as the mover. It contains of a tall rope which moves around two pulleys and brings water up by a bucket to irrigation channels.

It seems that the second one is more useful because raising water from greater depth and a cow walk on slope to help it not to tired soon but in the first method pushing water by man is not safe and they will be tired after a while.

In addition, there is no justification for using man as lifter. In the long time, it has clear drawbacks for them. so the second one is better not only more practical but also more logical.

Overall, both methods are traditional efforts of collecting water; however the second one is more useful.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... time, it has clear drawbacks for them. so the second one is better not only more ...
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'whereas', 'while', 'in addition']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.232227488152 0.268076937826 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.165876777251 0.116061578633 143% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0947867298578 0.0759168565197 125% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0663507109005 0.0366838410393 181% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0284360189573 0.0131127313244 217% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118483412322 0.155750635184 76% => OK
Participles: 0.0616113744076 0.0379272487307 162% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.30690426694 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0236966824645 0.0210936926555 112% => OK
Particles: 0.00473933649289 0.00175180941692 271% => OK
Determiners: 0.0995260663507 0.0948980150116 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00473933649289 0.00437022459523 108% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00947867298578 0.00967000014798 98% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1042.0 1161.00487805 90% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.9 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39896373057 5.90752243213 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73763899035 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.264248704663 0.337110787985 78% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.170984455959 0.247514529752 69% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.0932642487047 0.171178102325 54% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0621761658031 0.112407865282 55% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30690426694 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60103626943 0.546246751206 110% => OK
Word variations: 56.9925597213 49.3433353143 116% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 8.93414634146 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.3 23.0094962315 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5923317987 42.9750493124 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.2 135.714022679 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 23.0094962315 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.689975730869 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.84146341463 130% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 36.3984455959 47.7609492067 76% => OK
Elegance: 1.58181818182 2.94281807926 54% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305795362968 0.418131533498 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.116579872864 0.181151798455 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0598859439232 0.0850326197045 70% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.661169812851 0.706616315825 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.238475690914 0.157042692854 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143920807002 0.228904883108 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608228531641 0.108899403657 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.21049058234 0.367819155151 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0738519072598 0.0812612215331 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195439397629 0.316326947829 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054783675861 0.0921553760075 59% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.08536585366 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.02926829268 165% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 7.1512195122 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.