The diagrams show a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010
The plans illustrate the layout of a museum and the surrounding area in 1990 and 2010.
Overall, there were more exhibition rooms in 1990, and by 2010 a cafe had replaced a cottage next to the main road.
The garden shown at the top of the diagrams remained unchanged. At the foot of the plans, the main road was also unchanged, and on both plans a path in the centre connected the gardens and the main road.
An area to the right of this path was divided between a garden and a car parking space in 1990. However, in 2010 the car park was extended to occupy all this area. By contrast, there were several changes to the area left of the path. A cafe in 2010 replaced a cottage and, just below the entrance, the shop was enlarged, taking the place of one of the two exhibition rooms in 1990. The store room near the entrance was unchanged, but the two exhibition rooms near the entrance in 1990 were combined into one large exhibition space in 2010.
- The line graph below shows the average monthly temperatures in three major cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 78
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are the main energy source for many countries However some nations are using alternative energy such as solar power or wind power To what extent do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.36516853933 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28422434283 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488764044944 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4537621806 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197588883413 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955944842934 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10326915212 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157465712908 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125741768736 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.