different modes of transport used to travel in one European city in 1950 to 1970 and 1998 discussed in graph. write a report for a University lecturer describing the information in bar chart.
The given bar graph depicts information about the use of travelling vehicles by European citizens in three distinct years; 1950 to 1970 and 1990. The data is calibrated in percentum, which is clearly and coherently represented.
At a glance, a drastic increase in use of cars was observed, whereas travelling by foot decreased in the given data.
It is observed from graph, the travelling by foot was most popular mode of travelling in 1950. About 38% people used to travel by foot in year of 1950, which droped down in upcoming years of 1970 and 1990 to 19% and 5% respectively. Bikes were second most common means of transportation, that is, about 28% citizens used it in 1950, which falled to 25%, and then declined to 5%; which was lowest.
Furthermore, the cars were observed to the least used transportation medium in 1950; which showed upsurge of 25% qnd 39% usage in the years of 1970 and 1990 respectively. Moreover, the buses does not show much variation in its employment. The proportion was about 18% in 1950, which boosted to 26% by the year of 1970. A sharp decline was observed 16% in 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-19 | suman_preetkaur | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in Europe country between 1979 and 2004. 100
- what problems will your country face in next 10 years? how can we problems be overcome? 56
- the results of a research which examines the average percentage marks secured by boys and girls of different ages in several School subjects are given below 67
- the diagram below shows the stages and equipment is used in cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purpose. 78
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a down town business district. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, second, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74742268041 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7543962869 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556701030928 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3062949198 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198394624496 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845118594061 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815489911567 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130479924279 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586861598481 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.