Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately.
Do you agree or disagree with this view?
All badly-behaved students may have reasons for not behaving in the right way: their unmotivated teachers; the boring lessons; or due to poor family conditions, childhood traumas;... It is unreasonable of us, especially adults, to force them into a special class without minding what made them rebel against school rules.
Besides, being pushed into an isolated group could leave the children empty-headed. It can not be denied that these are the ones that reduce good students' efforts to study and teachers' efforts to teach, but if we look into the problems more clearly, being separated can cause even more severe lacks of inspiration for youngsters. Without good students to duplicate, disobedient students' attitudes may become overly worse.
To sum up, it would be a better idea if we come to terms with the fact that the all-good-world does not exist. Every living society has both positive and negative aspects. The matter is that we should take measures to treat them properly rather than classifying them carelessly yet wishing that it will create a kinder world.
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately Do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately Do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, look, may, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18285714286 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71684090256 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.725714285714 0.547539520022 133% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4485385108 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167209092067 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640670780123 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421545841275 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955066588596 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462819701621 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.