Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately.
Do you agree or disagree with this view?
These days, there is a saying that it is essential to divide undisciplined students and well-behaved ones into different classes. However, whether this action should be done or not, is still a mystery. Personally, I am against grouping students due to their behaviors.
All badly-behaved students may have reasons for not behaving in the right way: their unmotivated teachers; the boring lessons; or due to poor family conditions, childhood traumas;... It is unreasonable of us, especially adults, to force them into a special class without minding what made them rebel against school rules.
Besides, being pushed into an isolated group could leave the children empty-headed. It can not be denied that these are the ones that reduce good students' efforts to study and teachers' efforts to teach, but if we look into the problems more clearly, being separated can cause even more severe lacks of inspiration for youngsters. Without good students to duplicate, disobedient students' attitudes may become overly worse.
To sum up, it would be a better idea if we come to terms with the fact that the all-good-world does not exist. Every living society has both positive and negative aspects. The matter is that we should take measures to treat them properly rather than classifying them carelessly yet wishing that it will create a kinder world.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 89
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately Do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately Do you agree or disagree with this view 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, look, may, so, still, well, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 5.60731707317 446% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19724770642 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79628828618 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683486238532 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.090985485 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20500409425 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722056624982 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406039483495 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111634907061 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488556725646 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.