DIVORCE RATE
The bar graph illustrates two different types of topic that are the number of marriages and divorces and also the marital status of Adult, as it shows in four distinctive period of time in USA.
Looking at the first bar chart graph, in the year of 1970 and 1980 the number of marriages have been constant about 2.5 millions people, however looking at the divorce part it was slightly increase from 1 to 1.4 millions. Throughout the year in 1990 the number of marriage have been drop down to 2.3 millions, meanwhile the divorce bar chart was decrease by 0.3 millions. The last part of the year in 2000 both of the pie chart has slightly decline into 2 millions in marriages and 1 millions in divorces.
The second bar chart shows 4 categories status of adult American in two difference years. The first category show unmarried people in the year 1970 it started at 12% and then in 2000 it slowly increase to 20% of adults. Going to the next category that is married people has a high percentage of 70% in 1970, sadly in the following years it decline to 59% as there are fewer people having a hard time finding good partners. The third category tells about a husband or a wife that died during the time year where 9% is in 1970 while in 2000 it decrease by 2%. Looking at the last part that is known as divorced it started at 2%, suddenly the next few years it increase to 9% as many partners do not find pleasing at all to each other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar graph illustrates two different ...
^^^
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... Adult, as it shows in four distinctive period of time in USA. Looking at the first bar ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r distinctive period of time in USA. Looking at the first bar chart graph, in...
^^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...ing at the divorce part it was slightly increase from 1 to 1.4 millions. Throughout the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'declined'.
Suggestion: declined
...2000 both of the pie chart has slightly decline into 2 millions in marriages and 1 mill...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arriages and 1 millions in divorces. The second bar chart shows 4 categories ...
^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...adult American in two difference years. The first category show unmarried people in...
^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...arted at 12% and then in 2000 it slowly increase to 20% of adults. Going to the next cat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'declines'?
Suggestion: declines
...n 1970, sadly in the following years it decline to 59% as there are fewer people having...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreases'?
Suggestion: decreases
...ar where 9% is in 1970 while in 2000 it decrease by 2%. Looking at the last part that is...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 661, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...d at 2%, suddenly the next few years it increase to 9% as many partners do not find plea...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, second, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37686567164 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32501613856 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507462686567 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.8184149966 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7777777778 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0826944109216 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038068092931 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429952501725 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691593094654 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254708144132 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.72 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.