Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values)
Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health.
The provided line graph illustrates the acid level in the mouth which is created by consuming sweet foods specifically sugar and honey and the possibility of tooth decay because of this acid level. As is presented in the line-graph, the higher the acid level the lower the pH value and a pH level less than 5.5 is detrimental to the tooth and causes the tooth decay.
The given graph shows that the initial pH level of our mouth is 7 which begins to fall after consuming sweet foods. When we eat sweet item like cane sugar, the pH level drops to 3.5 after 5 minutes and remain in danger level (below pH level 5.5) for more than 30 minutes. Consuming fruit sugar drops the pH level nearly to 4 and remains at danger level for about 20 minutes. And finally, when we eat honey, the pH level falls below 5 and it remains under risk level for about 13 minutes. As the low pH level means higher acidity and causes tooth decay, cane sugar among the mentioned three food items is the most harmful to our tooth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-21 | hunanmail | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | benedetta | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | eloradorable | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | Mal111 | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-13 | nguyentrinh_tram | 73 | view |
- The advantages of English spreading as a global language will continue outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion 73
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36898395722 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13000767882 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513368983957 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7734326192 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376378790566 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204616839434 0.103423049105 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705321957438 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.330008228032 0.15604864568 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348328721866 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.