Essay topic: The bar chart shows the percentages of the Canadian workforce in five major industries in 1850 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates the proportion of Canadian workforce in five major industries which are manufacturing, services, agriculture/fishing, construction and energy/water in two separate years, 1850 and 2020.
In 1850, the percentage of Canadian workforce in manufacturing and services were much higher than other industries. About 36% and 33% of Canadian people worked in manufacturing and services respectively. Approximately 22% of Canadians worked in agriculture and fishing. The percentage of Canadian workforce in the remaining industries accounted for only a small fraction of 5% in construction and 3% in energy and water
Roughly 2 centuries later, the percentage of Canadian workforce in services superseded all the remaining industries and became approximately 81%, an increase of almost 50% from the figures of 1850. The proportion of Canadian people worked in construction also increased by 3% to 8% in 2020. In contrast, the percentage of Canadian workforce in manufacturing and agriculture/fishing dropped dramatically from 36% and 22% to onlu 9% and 1% consecutively. Only 1% of Canadian people worked in energy and water.
On the whole, the column graph shows that manufacturing and services were the most popular industries for Canadian people in 1850. However, in 2020, services became the most popular industry.
- Write a report describing the information in the graph below
- Many countries are experiencing serious problems with their environment with pollution of their land water and air What are these problems and how might they be reduced 73
- The Vertical Bar Graph Manifest the Information Regarding the Fertility Rates of Females
- The bar chart shows the percentages of the Canadian workforce in five major industries in 1850 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ked in construction also increased by 3% to 8% in 2020. In contrast, the percent...
^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eased by 3% to 8% in 2020. In contrast, the percentage of Canadian workforce in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, in contrast, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66336633663 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.58172336734 2.65546596893 135% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485148514851 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.235085667 43.030603864 200% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 114.4 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243789481874 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102428040484 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647074640393 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169679073142 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478852885577 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.