The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
The line graphs show the average monthly amount that British parents spent on their children’s sporting activities and the number of children who took part in three different sports from 200 to 2014.
It is clear that parents spend more money each year on their children’s participation in sports over the six-year period. In terms of the number of children taking part, football was considerably popular than athletics and swimming.
In 2008, British parents spend an average of money around 20 pounds per month on their children’s sporting activities Parent’s spending on children’s sports increased gradually over the following six years, and by 2014 the average monthly amount reached over 30 pounds per month.
Observing the participation numbers, in 2008 approximately 8 million children played football, whilst only about 2 million enrolled in swimming pools and less than 1 million practiced in athletics. The figures for football participation remained relatively stable over the following 6 years. By contrast, participation in swimming almost doubled, to nearly 4 million, and there was an approximately fivefold growth in the number of children doing athletics.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68508287293 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1806990191 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596685082873 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0879497731 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.285714285714 5.23603664747 5% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394969750396 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176228546744 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119175575961 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256056157211 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926357716288 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.4140731707 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.