Two pictorial line charts illustrate numerical information regarding British households’ expenditure on offspring’s physical activities per month as well as the chosen sports field, respectively, over the years 2008 to 2014.
As depicted, the domestic tendency to invest and spend in the children’s sports budget segment has a steady growth from approximately 20 pounds in 2008 to around 30 pounds in 2014, thereby rocketing by almost 50%.
A cursory glimpse through the second graph indicates that the youth participants engaged in three distinctive physical activitities, namely Football, Athletics, and swimming. Among the aforementioned scopes, soccer players have the highest rate of engagement at the beginning of the year 2008 with a number of more than 7.5 million, while athletics exercises had an eye-catching contradiction, with less than 500,000. Moreover, Football could hold its first place as the most favorite activity during the six years. However, its growth was not a kind of striking feature, since it hovered around 8.5 million.
Surging by around 400%, championship members could outpace swimmers from less than 1 million participants in 2008 to near 5 million in 2014, which is almost 5% more than the total population of swimmers. However, its bounce back in 2012 cannot be underestimated as it might be the initiation of a new plummeting feature.
Last but not least, in an upward rally, swimmers and athletics trends both met 2.5 million attendances in the year 2011, hence they crossed each other and continue their rising at a different pace.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, well, while, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40725806452 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01866968636 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 106.607317073 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693548387097 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.3727419 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7777777778 5.23603664747 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154934678306 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531124999404 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055883229476 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815835453586 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584069459841 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.