The first chat below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts provides information on the proportion of average energy consumption in average Australian household and the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions as a result of these energy uses.
Overall, if we looking at the first chart is that heating was the main type of energy usage at 42 %, while water heating was the type of energy which produced more greenhouse emissions at 32 %. Another main feature is that the cooling was the least precious type of energy in both pie charts at 2 % and 3 % respectively.
To begin with, water heating was the second energy consumption at 30%, whereas other appliances consist only half of them. Then, next kinds of energy usage were refrigeration and lighting which former prevailed latter by 3 %.
However, in second chart had some differences from first. There second type of greenhouse gas emissions in Australian house was other appliances at just over a quarter. Simultaneously, energy which consumed from heating and refrigeration were nearly similar at 15 % and 14 %, in turn. These energy types exceeded lighting approximately by 6 %.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, so, then, whereas, while, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17045454545 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92720438642 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573863636364 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4362034156 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.111111111 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 5.23603664747 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276646234605 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128501646898 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764865318888 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197955494613 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858166037274 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.