The first graph below shows the weight (in tonnes) of fruit produced by a farm during each month in 2013, and also the amount (in tonnes) of fertiliser used. The second graph shows the volume of rainfall in each month (in millimetres).
Given is the graph illustrating the amount of fruit which is offered by a farm, and the number of fertilizer utilized; the other graph revealed the rainfall in millimetres around 2013.
It is clear that the figure for the amount of fertilizer was subject to overall volatility. Meanwhile, the volume of rainfall also generally fluctuated during each month in 2013.
To embark on, the weight of fruit stood at 2 tonnes in January and jumped further to peak at about 4,2 tonnes in August. After that, it plunged to the first point in December. By contrast, there were only 0,5 tonnes in the quantity of fertilizer usage in the first month and continued to change dramatically; even there was a period the weight bottomed at 0 tonnes.
The quantity of rainfall with the early high of 16mm in February, but decreased significantly until July at 4 mm and followed by a period of stability. After increasing and decreasing differently, rainfall experienced a slight recovery to 14 mm.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-08 | Rapunzel | 73 | view |
| 2018-03-20 | GulyamovOT | 93 | view |
- The diagram below give information about two road tunnels in one Australian city 92
- The graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030. 78
- The diagram below shows the nitrogen cycle 88
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system. 73
- The table shows the average annual percentages of water pollution in four large cities in 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92814371257 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84315766075 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592814371257 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9510609236 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.875 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31926878493 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117503771066 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105950744763 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170336247807 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845813628901 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.