The first graph gives the number of passengers travelling by train in Sydney The second graph provides information on the percentage of trains running on time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher

Essay topics:

The first graph gives the number of passengers travelling by train in Sydney. The second graph provides information on the percentage of trains running on time.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graphs depicts information on the number of people commuting through the train in Sydney and the rate of trains that ran on time. The study covers the period from 1995 to 2004.

Generally, there was a significant upward movement in the trend of people traveling by train for nine years. It is also clear that the percentage of trains traveling on time recorded a remarkable decrease over the same period.

From 1995 to 1999, there was a gradual increase of train commuters starting at 250 Million during the initial year to over 265 Million. Within the next two years, the figure reached a high of 300 Million before it went back to its previous number in 2000. This was followed by a steady record until the end of the timeframe which was about 30 Million difference than that of its initial data in 1995.

Concurrently, the ratio of trains running on time from 93 % in 1995 made a decrement at about 86 % in 1997. This was followed by a rise of 7 % over the next two years. In 2000, it dipped to 85 % before going back to about 93 % in 2002. In 2004, the percentage dropped to as low as about 73 %. By comparison, this was four folds less than its proportion in 1995.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (11 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-09-13 asmita acharya 84 view
2019-08-24 Jonkun 82 view
Essays by user Jonkun :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47222222222 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41837781456 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0416411669 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179210789174 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681629677755 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935280638334 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135813179901 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919184596866 0.0819641961636 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.35 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.