The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.
The upper chart illustrates the changes in the number of passengers traveling by trains and the lower graph
shows
the proportion of trains running punctually in a 10-year-period from 2000 to 2009 compared to the target.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of travelers using trains
showed
an unsteady upward trend. The figure for train running on time also saw the same minor fluctuation.
In the first four years, the number of train travelers rose from around more than 40 million, and then turned to its first peak of about 37 million in 2002 before dropping to just below its starting number in 2003. also in that period, the proportions of trains running on time rose sharply from 92% to 95.5%. During the next three years, there was both enormous growth in the rate of train passengers and trains running on time, while the train travelers reached a peak of more than 45 million people in 2005. In terms of running efficiency, the rate was 96% in 2004, but later fell drastically to 92% in 2006
In the last three years, while the number of passengers stabilized around 43%, compared to the significant increase of trains running on time, with the gradual improvement and eventually the highest point of 97%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | nhungnhungnhungnhung | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-07 | tramy3805 | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-07 | tramy3805 | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-16 | phanhhh | 73 | view |
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 73
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... traveling by trains and the lower graph shows the proportion of trains running...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2000 to 2009 compared to the target. Overall, it can be seen that the number ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat the number of travelers using trains showed an unsteady upward trend. The f...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...also saw the same minor fluctuation. In the first four years, the number of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...just below its starting number in 2003. also in that period, the proportions of trai...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ater fell drastically to 92% in 2006 In the last three years, while the numbe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85849056604 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50396623791 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537735849057 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.1086885457 43.030603864 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.142857143 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2857142857 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.509139592822 0.215688989381 236% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242580298515 0.103423049105 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124360202137 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242947394441 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10154425843 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.