The following bar chart illustrates the mobile phone ownership in ten European countries throughout the year from 2005 to 2010
The bar chart provides the number of mobile phone owner growth in ten European countries in two years: 2005 and 2010.
Generally speaking, in 2005, the number of mobile phone owners was high at this time. We can see that three countries UK, Germany, Italy had more mobile phone owner than others. They accounted for averagely 4 million owners. Sweden was forth (after UK, Germany, Italy) and had approximately 2 million owners. In general, France, Finland, Norway, Denmark, Spain had nearly the same number (about 1 million). And with Netherland, this country had the less number of owners in 10 country (0.5 million)
In 2010, the number of mobile phone owners increase stronger. Germany become the country which had the highest number of owners with 14 million. Next country was UK (12 million owners). Italy, Sweden, France, Spain was in the descending order (100,9,7,5 million). Finland, Norway, Denmark and Netherland increase insignificantly over 5 years (approximately 2 million owners)
Overall, the number of mobile phone owners in 2010 was higher than the number in 2005. Because of the modern world, the demand of using mobile phones alway grown rapidly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-22 | Nguyễn Hương Giang | 92 | view |
| 2019-02-26 | phoenix0811 | 89 | view |
| 2018-12-26 | Nguyen My | 56 | view |
- Some people think that large, impressive buildings are important for a city. Others believe that the money should be spent on improving schools and hospitals. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- From: Joanne DiazTo: Harvey’s CleanersSubject: Misplaced clothingSent: Feb 18, 3:15 P.MI am writing to complain about my recent cleaning order. I came to pick up my order from your clerk on Friday. I noticed that there were two items missing.The clerk l 22
- The following bar chart illustrates the mobile phone ownership in ten European countries throughout the year from 2005 to 2010 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart provides the number of mob...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...countries in two years: 2005 and 2010. Generally speaking, in 2005, the number ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er of owners in 10 country 0.5 million In 2010, the number of mobile phone owne...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...5 years approximately 2 million owners Overall, the number of mobile phone owne...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, as for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1914893617 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56182052458 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4146201209 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3333333333 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221313322926 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963894661703 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116127548101 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204494315685 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134712430347 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.