The following charts represent the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The two given charts illustrate the proportion of weight issues of Charlestown's residents in 1955 and 2015.
Overall, it is noticed that the ideal and underweight range decreased significantly after a sixty-year period while the percentage of overweight and obese people increased dramatically.
At a first glance, in 1955, people who have an ideal body account for the highest proportion of all age group (more than 50%). At the same time, the underweight condition appears mostly on the elder and the adolescence (30-40%). In 1955, overweight and obesity were not warning issues as their percentage only account for over 20% of the total number of inhabitants.
Over 60 years, in 2015, the percentage of ideal range declined considerably at 60-69 age group (5% left) with a tumble of obesity and overweight proportion at both middle-age and older range. Fortunately, people from 30 to 59 years old did not have to suffer from underweight condition as its percentage decline to only 2-3% of the total.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09756097561 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93775906372 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615853658537 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7108544676 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.428571429 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0927330792919 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051872376588 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649481775962 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784334885787 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746182441103 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.