The following charts represent the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given two pie charts illustrate, the average weight evaluation of people between the age group of 20 to 69 over the year of 1955 and 2015 in Charlestown. Assessment categorized in four section such as, underweight, ideal, overweight, obese. Units measured in percentage.
Overall, as age increases obese people range also dramatically rose in 2015. Where as, in 1955 only mere ten percent of people suffering obesity even after 40 years old. Most of the people has ideal weight in 1955 between the ratio of 10% to 70% for all age group in contrast to 2015. In addition, Not even one person has obesity in 1955 in the age of 30 to 39.
Regarding overweight people in Charlestown, increased during middle age with 35% to 45 % in 2015 that is compared to higher than which is mere 20% in 1955. There was only 5% of indigenous people was suffering overweight in 50 to 59 year old in 2015. Meanwhile, in 1955 percentage is slightly higher than the given period with 10%.
In terms of underweight, was higher in 1955 with all age group especially 60 to 69 year old with 50% as compared to 1955. There was about less than 20% of all age range. Inhabitants with mere two percent has underweight between the age of 30 to 59 by 2015. Moreover, ideal weight of old age represents less than three percent in 2015 which is very low in contrast to 1955 which is approximately 50% .
- Today, high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree. Write at least 250 and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 73
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other, while others think that people have become more independent. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- The diagram below gives the information about the Hawaiian island chain in the centre of the Pacific Ocean.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown. 56
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 74
- Advertisements on toys and fast foods lure children most Do you think it has negative effect on children as well as family 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'section' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sections'.
Suggestion: sections
...lestown. Assessment categorized in four section such as, underweight, ideal, overweight...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...e range also dramatically rose in 2015. Where as, in 1955 only mere ten percent of peopl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...deal weight in 1955 between the ratio of 10% to 70% for all age group in contrast...
^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ring middle age with 35% to 45 % in 2015 that is compared to higher than which is...
^^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...trast to 1955 which is approximately 50% .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, regarding, so, while, in addition, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59109311741 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6603205079 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485829959514 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5229170438 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180555802204 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724312550123 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496323644183 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129243306304 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296414023474 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.