The following graphs depict the reliability of print and non-print academic materials as voiced by undergraduates and postgraduates at 3 different British universities.
The bar graps illustrate the information about undergraduates and postgraduates from 3 different British universities reliability of print and without print academic materials.
It can be seen clearly, 90% postgraduates student and 80% undergraduates students were printed reliable materials at University of Oxford. However near about 70% reliable materials printed in University of Cambridge by undergraduates more than nine percent by postgraduates at Same University printed materials can be seen in University of Leeds by postgraduates at 92% followed by undergraduates at less than 12%.
Probing further, non-print materials can be observed in University of Oxford by undergraduates at 60% their counterpart was50% in University of Cambridge and University of Leeds undergraduates student printed almost similer materials at 60% postgraduates student printed 50% in University of Cambridge.
Overall, maximum materials printed in University of leeds by postgraduates and minimum at University of Cambridge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
... postgraduates from 3 different British universities reliability of print and without print ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.14685314685 4.92477711251 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.6722676122 2.65546596893 138% => OK
Unique words: 68.0 106.607317073 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475524475524 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.6190324247 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.8 112.824112599 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412942948989 0.215688989381 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.28118007064 0.103423049105 272% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609173200052 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29561277064 0.15604864568 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665308289132 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 13.2329268293 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.68 61.2550243902 29% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.51609756098 244% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.8 10.3012195122 173% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.98 11.4140731707 166% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 11.0658536585 199% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.