Given is 2 pie charts comparing favorite recreation activities of adult in Europe between 1985 and 1995. In general, it is evident that watching TV was the most widely enjoyed in the percentages over 10 years.
As can be seen from the charts, a majority of European adults were interested in watching TV in the period, however the rate saw a fall of 2% from 1985 to 1995.
In 1985, eating out was the second most favoured activities and this figure decreased to one-third after 10 years. Interesting, talking with family is the same, indicated a reduce from 18% to 7% of total activities.
Regarding, chatting with friend was the third most popularity activities in the both of year, with making up 21% and 26% in 1985 and 1995, respectively. Specially, it is clear that play computer games had just appeared in 1995 and consisted of 27%.
Finally, in terms of other activities, the rate dropped to 4% from 1985 to 1995.
- Some people regard to video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful education tool. Other, however, believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks of video game outweigh benefits. 61
- the table below shows the percentage of main types of dwelling in Victoria the Northern Territory and Tasmania Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 94
- the table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary school in 2005 and 2015. 73
- the graph below changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 to 2011 73
- the line charts compare how much time it would take for three companies to manufacture a car from 200 to 2012 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...king with family is the same, indicated a reduce from 18% to 7% of total activities. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, regarding, second, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77160493827 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68089624835 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635802469136 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1530949411 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.625 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164268458743 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708704873197 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642553910621 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892921206498 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332005698195 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.