Being replaced by free virtual resources -- books and magazines would be a story of the past, claimed by a prediction. It goes on to say that the printed forms would lose the market. However, in my opinion, I do not agree with the idea because nothing can be absolutely out of cost, also if it is free, it will be lacking in quality.
To begin with, if books and newspapers are to be complimentary there must be some hidden costs included. In other words, free reading opportunities will be provided only when people subscribe to some particular platform or media. Due to the very nature of the internet and online business strategies, it can be assumed that probably the news will be with zero charge, however, the membership or the subscription would possibly need some money or anything exchangeable. For instance, being completely free Facebook is rather asking for something else in return -- personal information -- which makes the company look cost-free superficially, although, on a deeper level, It is not true.
Yet another reason for me to believe my statement is that nothing free can make up for the quality. This is to say that running a free business would make the newspaper industry compromised in quality. The columnist writers, journalists would be profoundly affected If the products go free. And this will lead the staff to quit for better opportunities. As a result, the free platforms will suffer from quality deficiency, which will make the survival of these platforms questionable in the future. For example, newspapers, lacking in quality but free of cost, often disappear due to their compromised services as well as for the loss of their employees.
To sum up, free offers often come with hidden charges and declining quality. Therefore, I think, in the future, we will probably read everything online, though zero cost appears to be a rare possibility.
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Disucss both thes 78
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 561, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs, lacking in quality but free of cost, often disappear due to their compromised...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, for instance, i think, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 1.00243902439 1696% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 965.302439024 163% => OK
No of words: 314.0 196.424390244 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01910828025 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85359435212 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 106.607317073 170% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576433121019 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 283.868780488 171% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2052391068 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.066666667 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 5.23603664747 223% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195970892165 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748414859605 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517163642603 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133332741497 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329435248866 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 40.7170731707 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.