Garlsdon town
The picture compares two proposed positions, namely S1 and S2 for a new supermarket in Garlsdon Town, whose population is 65000.
It is clear that the main difference between the two sites is that S1 is located in the outskirts, whereas S2 is in the heart of the town. Obviously, each location has its own advantages and drawbacks.
Looking at the information for more detail, located in the town center enable S2 to attract all customers from the surrounding residential area. S1 is also close to the housing area, but located in the north west to the center makes it would be more difficult to reach from the east of the housing area.
There are three main roads from the town centre to Hindon, Bransdon and Cransdon with 12 km, 16 km and 25 km respectively. But since town center is a traffic-free zone, there would be no access to S2 by cars. By contrast, S1 is laid adjacent to the main road to Hindon, but it is much far away from Cransdon and Bransdon. Both S1 and S2 are close to the railway that links Hindon to Cransdon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | mirandajose | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | mirandajose | 78 | view |
- table agr group rode bicycles in 2011 73
- many people disagree with a school policy which forces children to learn new languages. 78
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today. What are the causes of Global warming and what measures can government and individuals take to tackle the issue? 84
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries. 78
- Manifacture bricks for the building industry 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4708994709 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57434459173 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560846560847 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8879210074 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8888888889 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191623268494 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075941774163 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824689955024 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124447776669 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792949827546 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.