Given is a bar graph regarding the GDP growth of Tunisia,Japan,Ecuador per year from 2007 to 2010 in percentage.
In 2007,Tunisia had more than 6%GDP growth but in next year it decreased to just above 4%later it declined to 3% and remained almost same until 2010.Unlike in Tunisia Japan had a very lower growth at initial period but, in 2008 it rose to 4%,The improvement is continued even for remaining years and settled at highest point at more than 6%
When it comes to Ecuador it had higher GDP growth than the Japan and lower than Tunisia in 2007 i.e, at 3%.
and it increased in next year settled just below 5% later it faced sudden drop it reached to 1%.In 2010 Ecuador improved its growth from 1% to more than 2%
To conclude, Tunisia has seen declination over the entire period, Japan improved its growth each and every year,ecuador faced fluctuations remarkably
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 78
- GDP growth per-year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 61
- the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 56
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Japan
...raph regarding the GDP growth of Tunisia,Japan,Ecuador per year from 2007 to 2010 in p...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... year from 2007 to 2010 in percentage. In 2007,Tunisia had more than 6%GDP grow...
^^^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Unlike
... 3% and remained almost same until 2010.Unlike in Tunisia Japan had a very lower growt...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...settled at highest point at more than 6% When it comes to Ecuador it had higher G...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...lower than Tunisia in 2007 i.e, at 3%. and it increased in next year settled just ...
^^^
Line 6, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...r it faced sudden drop it reached to 1%.In 2010 Ecuador improved its growth from 1...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ved its growth from 1% to more than 2% To conclude, Tunisia has seen declinatio...
^^^
Line 8, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , ecuador
... improved its growth each and every year,ecuador faced fluctuations remarkably
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 731.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77777777778 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8141334829 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59477124183 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 51.0 22.4926829268 227% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 139.38675212 43.030603864 324% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 243.666666667 112.824112599 216% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 51.0 22.9334400587 222% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273959665969 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221237095279 0.103423049105 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083050233385 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17324624099 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867086298406 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.6 13.2329268293 201% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.8 10.3012195122 202% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 11.4329268293 232% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 22.4 10.9970731707 204% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 27.0 11.0658536585 244% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.