Given is a line graph about the changes in the share price of outokumpu campanies during January 2006 to december 2010 in Euros according to NASDAQOMX Helsinki
In 2006 initially the share price was more than 10euros, gradually it shot up to its peak value 31 euros at the end of the
year.Then in 2007 cost of share fell slightly and went up and down widely throughout year and finally settled just above 20
euros after that in 2008 the rate of share slowly incresead and climbed to nearly peakpoint i.e, 30 euros in the middle of year but,later it faced a significant drop of 22 euros, the fluctuation in price experienced even in the next two years,and finally it reached to 12 euros at the end of the period.
Hence ,we can conclude in this entire period outokumpu made significantgains and losses but in those five years it obtained highest price twice and faced least price once at 8 euros per share
- the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 56
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 78
- GDP growth per-year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 61
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g January 2006 to december 2010 in Euros according to NASDAQOMX Helsinki In 20...
^^
Line 4, column 7, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
...value 31 euros at the end of the year.Then in 2007 cost of share fell slightly and...
^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , later
... i.e, 30 euros in the middle of year but,later it faced a significant drop of 22 euros...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ficant drop of 22 euros, the fluctuation in price experienced even in the next tw...
^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...e experienced even in the next two years,and finally it reached to 12 euros at the e...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to 12 euros at the end of the period. Hence ,we can conclude in this entire pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the end of the period. Hence ,we can conclude in this entire period ou...
^^
Line 8, column 116, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'obtained the highest'.
Suggestion: obtained the highest
...s and losses but in those five years it obtained highest price twice and faced least price once ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 149, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'faced the least'.
Suggestion: faced the least
...ars it obtained highest price twice and faced least price once at 8 euros per share ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed least price once at 8 euros per share
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 760.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66257668712 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50458572986 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631901840491 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 2.0 8.94146341463 22% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 81.0 22.4926829268 360% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 264.0 43.030603864 614% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 380.0 112.824112599 337% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 81.5 22.9334400587 355% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 14.5 5.23603664747 277% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229135405187 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165840218099 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593621433855 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135288824138 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114020627186 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 41.3 13.2329268293 312% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 6.18 61.2550243902 10% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 32.5 10.3012195122 315% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.93 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.24 8.06136585366 139% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.4329268293 464% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 34.4 10.9970731707 313% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.