The given bar chart illustrates the figures for the frequency of having junk foods at the restaurants of American people from 2003 to 2013.
The given bar chart illustrates the figures for the frequency of having junk foods at the restaurants of American people from 2003 to 2013.
It can clearly be seen that there was a slightly downward movement from once per week to once or twice per month which American residents went outside to eat at a restaurant over the period of ten years.
Looking at the information in more detail, the highest point of frequency was recorded once a week in the year of 2003 and 2006 (31% and 33%, respectively). In 2003, the lowest frequency had a fairly equal proportion between people never eating outside and people eating at restaurants on a daily basis, which at roughly 5%. In 2006, the percentage of eating once per week showed a significant increase to around 38% while that of once or twice per month saw a sharp fall to about 25%.
As illustrated, at the end of the investigated period, the figures for going outside every day for eating and never eating at restaurants remained stable (approximately 3% and 4%, correspondingly). In contrast, the highest category belonged to the group of once or twice per month in the same year, which accounted for about 33%. Also, this figure was twice as high as that for the group of several times per week (nearly 16%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | quynhan1995 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- In many cities, there is little control on the design and construction of new homes and office buildings, and people can build houses in their own style. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a situation? 78
- Caring for children is probably the most important job in any society. Because of this, all mothers and fathers should be required to take a course that prepares them to be good parents. 78
- The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 countries in Europe in 2005, 2009 and 2015, compared with the European average. 73
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7027027027 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64844946239 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536036036036 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.6036807738 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373314101224 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207372542289 0.103423049105 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.305753470133 0.0843802449381 362% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.348280134999 0.15604864568 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.3769053348 0.0819641961636 460% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.