The given charts give information about the number of students at university in the Uk from 1991 to 2002, government spending and the types of family economic background they cam from in 1991
The given diagrams illustrate the number of ungraduates in the UK, the authorities expense on each learner in two decades, which is from 1991 to 2001 and the rate of students by household financial conditions in 1991.
Overall, in the first year of this period, a wide range of students come from families with medium income. Besides that, the number of people pursuing higher education still increased through the examined era while the allowance that the state spent for learners was declined.
Concerning the two trends, more and more individuals started learning in universities, the number of that was at just north of ten million in the first year, which was rapidly increased to more than fifteen million after four years of the 21st century. By contrast, the money that governments used for assisting the learners having difficult circumstances decreased, from 6500 pounds in 1991 to just south of 5000 pounds after half of decade. After that, this still remained unchanged until the last year of examined era.
Turning to the remaining pie chart, the figure for learners of medium salary households ranked first, at 62%, which was double than that of the high one, standing at 30%. Nevertheless, only 8% accounted for the low income, which was the smallest rate of the total in 1991.
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people have benefited from modern communications technology but some people have not benefited from it at all To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think that countries should produce food their population eats and import less food as much as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In some parts of the world traditional festivals and celebrations have disappeared or are disappearing What do you think are the causes of this development and what measures could be taken to solve it 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, nevertheless, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00925925926 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56745418414 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587962962963 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.850131926 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.25 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187134293009 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081712667875 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741088293756 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126174354021 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712555700073 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.