The pie charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The given pie charts depicts the proportion of working adults devote their time to distinctive activities in a specific country in 1958 and 2008.
Overview, working adults allocated most of their free time on working and sleeping in 1995 and 2008. Additionally, time for relaxing at home increased, as opposed to going out and travelling to work, which people spent less time than the other.
In 1958, spending time working occupied almost third of the day (33%), while sleeping accounted for less time, at 32%. At that time, sociallizing with friends and involving in other personal habit or sports in their spare time made up of 19% and 6% of the total. Only 10% of time was devoted to sleep and relax at home.
After the period of 50 years, working still occupied the highest percentage with the figure being recorded at 42%, meanwhile time for unwinding witnessed a slight rise and accounted for 13% of the total. Traveling to work observed a fourfold increase to 8% in the next 50 years. By contrary, engaging in interests or sports and hanging with acquaintances made up only 14%, which is lower by 11% compared to 1958.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-19 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
2024-07-08 | Sajib Ahamed | 89 | view |
2024-01-21 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
2023-11-03 | tracywu | 73 | view |
2023-02-01 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 78
- The bar chart below shows the popularity of well known Instagram accounts in 2011 and 2021 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The picture illustrates the disparity of a park named Grange Park between 1920 and today 67
- The bar chart below shows the popularity of well known Instagram accounts in 2018 and 2021 78
- The pie chart gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to 8% in the next 50 years. By contrary, engaging in interests or sports and hang...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78461538462 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54617321241 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605128205128 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1873167581 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205513640222 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965991009067 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815040949852 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157505254624 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874223627491 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.